<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tissue: A Product Comparison</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nothingedifying.com/2007/01/tissue-a-product-comparison/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nothingedifying.com/2007/01/tissue-a-product-comparison/</link>
	<description>dilettantism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:48:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mim</title>
		<link>http://nothingedifying.com/2007/01/tissue-a-product-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-2049</link>
		<dc:creator>mim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nothingedifying.com/2007/01/09/tissue-a-product-comparison/#comment-2049</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s actually not that much more expensive:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&amp;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FKleenex-ColdCare-Facial-Tissues-Unscented%2Fdp%2FB000E1PIUW%2Fsr%3D1-3%2Fqid%3D1168390430%3Fie%3DUTF8%26s%3Dhpc&amp;tag=nothingedifyi-20&amp;linkCode=ur2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Kleenex ColdCare tissue&lt;/a&gt; is supposedly 1080 tissues for $31.78 while &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&amp;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FGreen-Forest-Facial-Assorted-Twenty-Four%2Fdp%2FB000F4Z858%2Fsr%3D1-8%2Fqid%3D1168390430%3Fie%3DUTF8%26s%3Dhpc&amp;tag=nothingedifyi-20&amp;linkCode=ur2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Green Forest tissue&lt;/a&gt; is 4200 tissues for 39.58, so the Green Forest tissue is a lot cheaper!  Admittedly the Kleenex is 3 ply, but seriously, how many do you need?  Anyhows, even if it were more expensive, it&#039;s worth it for the better bleaching process and the post-consumer recycled paper content, doncha think?
You should read &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nrdc.org/land/forests/gtissue.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;A Shopper&#039;s Guide to Home Tissue Products&lt;/a&gt;, which says, &quot;If every household in the United States replaced just one box of virgin fiber facial tissues (175 sheets) with 100% recycled ones, we could save 163,000 trees.&quot;  Just 1 box!  Crazy, ain&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s actually not that much more expensive:<br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&amp;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FKleenex-ColdCare-Facial-Tissues-Unscented%2Fdp%2FB000E1PIUW%2Fsr%3D1-3%2Fqid%3D1168390430%3Fie%3DUTF8%26s%3Dhpc&amp;tag=nothingedifyi-20&amp;linkCode=ur2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">Kleenex ColdCare tissue</a> is supposedly 1080 tissues for $31.78 while <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&amp;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FGreen-Forest-Facial-Assorted-Twenty-Four%2Fdp%2FB000F4Z858%2Fsr%3D1-8%2Fqid%3D1168390430%3Fie%3DUTF8%26s%3Dhpc&amp;tag=nothingedifyi-20&amp;linkCode=ur2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">Green Forest tissue</a> is 4200 tissues for 39.58, so the Green Forest tissue is a lot cheaper!  Admittedly the Kleenex is 3 ply, but seriously, how many do you need?  Anyhows, even if it were more expensive, it&#8217;s worth it for the better bleaching process and the post-consumer recycled paper content, doncha think?<br />
You should read <a href="http://www.nrdc.org/land/forests/gtissue.asp" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">A Shopper&#8217;s Guide to Home Tissue Products</a>, which says, &#8220;If every household in the United States replaced just one box of virgin fiber facial tissues (175 sheets) with 100% recycled ones, we could save 163,000 trees.&#8221;  Just 1 box!  Crazy, ain&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Special K</title>
		<link>http://nothingedifying.com/2007/01/tissue-a-product-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-2048</link>
		<dc:creator>Special K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 19:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nothingedifying.com/2007/01/09/tissue-a-product-comparison/#comment-2048</guid>
		<description>isnt that stuff expensive?? o_O...

sigh... only u and tigs would come up with the idea of taking advantage of ur sick situation...instead of just resting and getting better! lol dorks :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>isnt that stuff expensive?? o_O&#8230;</p>
<p>sigh&#8230; only u and tigs would come up with the idea of taking advantage of ur sick situation&#8230;instead of just resting and getting better! lol dorks :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CT</title>
		<link>http://nothingedifying.com/2007/01/tissue-a-product-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-2047</link>
		<dc:creator>CT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 14:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nothingedifying.com/2007/01/09/tissue-a-product-comparison/#comment-2047</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve only seen Seventh Generation at Target.  It&#039;s sad.  I&#039;ll have to look more closely at what Trader Joe&#039;s offers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve only seen Seventh Generation at Target.  It&#8217;s sad.  I&#8217;ll have to look more closely at what Trader Joe&#8217;s offers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

